股項 代號 高 低 支持 阻力 開 閉 14日平均價
1.華陽（HUAYANG） 5062 0.95 0.635 0.805 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.869
該公司建議，以5送1方式派發1800萬股紅股，這是冷門股。
2.美佳第一（MFCB） 3069 1.76 0.97 1.52 1.76 1.63 1.65 1.65
該公司以1229萬2400令吉，認購加迪影像（JADI，7223，主板工業產品組）的6146萬2000股面值10仙私下配股。
3. 高峰控股（BPURI） 5932 1.42 0.705 1.08 1.42 1.14 1.42 1.13
該公司獲大馬機場（AIRPORT，5014，主板貿服組）頒發總值9億9722萬7000令吉的廉航終站大廈建築合約。
4.時光工程（TIME） 4456 0.59 0.26 0.36 0.59 0.41 0.455 0.39
市場傳出UEM集團可能宣佈脫售時光工程，但後者已澄清目前尚未有相關洽談。
5.德成控股（TEKSENG） 7200 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.40 0.37 0.37 0.35
該公司營業額已連續4個財政年突破1億令吉大關，全年凈利也維持沖破1000萬令吉的最亮眼紀錄，這是冷門股。
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Monday, July 19, 2010
经济眼：别耍“权威”挑战投资！●杨名万
经济眼：别耍“权威”挑战投资！●杨名万
2010/07/19 6:36:41 PM
●杨名万 财经评论员
大马2010年度经济挟着首季双位数增长余威，进入下半年。国内政治人物仍然以为国家经济本钱雄厚，下半年大玩种族“权威”牌，挑战国家的投资能耐。
身为大家长的首相拿督斯里纳吉，更苦口婆心劝告巫统领袖，不要抛出极端言论抨击新加坡投资者，因为我们需要他们的投资。
同样在7月，首相宣布展开削减补贴活动，避免补贴开销加剧财政赤字。
这些发生在7月的大事都与“权威”有关，而且都会影响投资环境，处理不好不但会令我国吸引资金努力受挫，甚至还会驱走已在我国投资的资金。
净流入外资减6成
根据统计局公布的我国国际收支账项，过去3年，我国都面对直接资金净外流现象。2007年净外流逾93亿，2008年近261亿，去年再净外流逾229亿。今年首季直接投资转而净流入逾12亿令吉，政府高官与政治人物沾沾自喜，以为情况已改观。
其实不然，今年首季比去年末季好转至净流入，并不意味今年全年直接投资将保持这净流入状态。去年是典型例子，首季直接投资同样净流入，而且净流入逾30亿，全年反而大幅度净流出229亿。今年首季净流入资金还比去年同时期锐减逾59%或约六成。
随着政府对外劳诸多限制，欧美经济又传出可能会面对双底衰退情况下，投资环境原本就严峻，土著权威组织偏偏在这时刻耍弄种族课题，令环境进一步恶化。
政府近期削减补贴政策，只宣布当下减低幅度，没宣布接下来的后续缓冲措施，更没提到长期减低补贴方向，国人搞不清接下来会不会每半年调整一次，过路费和电费会不会也调高。国内的人搞不懂，海外人士更难明白。
决策不定增添风险
国内外投资最忌不定局面。政府没有彻底揭开补贴决策方向，留下好几个建议悬案，令投资者混淆，搞不清那些会付诸执行。这种卖弄权威举动，再次挑战国家投资能耐。
政府容许土著权威组织卖弄土著权威皇牌，从极端捍卫土著权益谈话，到反对政府新经济模式，要求无止尽实行土著30%股权政策，让工商界看到纳吉政府执行经济改革的无力感。
除了这30%土著股权外，他们更担心这权威组织提出更多非分要求，政府如果照单全收，将为投资添更多风险。
土著权威组织闹大后，马华副总会长林祥才又建议华人也来一个权威组织。族群权威组织林立，再配上执政的国阵也是以种族为基础，种族两极化潜伏，投资风险再升一级。
新世纪全球化思维
除了土著权威组织，国阵主要成员党巫统领袖的作风，更尽显耍弄权威之能事，搞到党主席首相纳吉忍无可忍要求柔佛州内领袖，不要发表敏感言论吓走新加坡投资。
纳吉说得好，州巫统领袖不应再情绪化，思想更不可狭隘，我们已经处于21世纪，这个国家必须要有21世纪的思维水准。
的确，全民都须跟得上21世纪全球化时代，别只在国内卖弄“权威”，误国殃民。到国际舞台去，那里才知道谁是“权威”，谁有实力！
2010/07/19 6:36:41 PM
●杨名万 财经评论员
大马2010年度经济挟着首季双位数增长余威，进入下半年。国内政治人物仍然以为国家经济本钱雄厚，下半年大玩种族“权威”牌，挑战国家的投资能耐。
身为大家长的首相拿督斯里纳吉，更苦口婆心劝告巫统领袖，不要抛出极端言论抨击新加坡投资者，因为我们需要他们的投资。
同样在7月，首相宣布展开削减补贴活动，避免补贴开销加剧财政赤字。
这些发生在7月的大事都与“权威”有关，而且都会影响投资环境，处理不好不但会令我国吸引资金努力受挫，甚至还会驱走已在我国投资的资金。
净流入外资减6成
根据统计局公布的我国国际收支账项，过去3年，我国都面对直接资金净外流现象。2007年净外流逾93亿，2008年近261亿，去年再净外流逾229亿。今年首季直接投资转而净流入逾12亿令吉，政府高官与政治人物沾沾自喜，以为情况已改观。
其实不然，今年首季比去年末季好转至净流入，并不意味今年全年直接投资将保持这净流入状态。去年是典型例子，首季直接投资同样净流入，而且净流入逾30亿，全年反而大幅度净流出229亿。今年首季净流入资金还比去年同时期锐减逾59%或约六成。
随着政府对外劳诸多限制，欧美经济又传出可能会面对双底衰退情况下，投资环境原本就严峻，土著权威组织偏偏在这时刻耍弄种族课题，令环境进一步恶化。
政府近期削减补贴政策，只宣布当下减低幅度，没宣布接下来的后续缓冲措施，更没提到长期减低补贴方向，国人搞不清接下来会不会每半年调整一次，过路费和电费会不会也调高。国内的人搞不懂，海外人士更难明白。
决策不定增添风险
国内外投资最忌不定局面。政府没有彻底揭开补贴决策方向，留下好几个建议悬案，令投资者混淆，搞不清那些会付诸执行。这种卖弄权威举动，再次挑战国家投资能耐。
政府容许土著权威组织卖弄土著权威皇牌，从极端捍卫土著权益谈话，到反对政府新经济模式，要求无止尽实行土著30%股权政策，让工商界看到纳吉政府执行经济改革的无力感。
除了这30%土著股权外，他们更担心这权威组织提出更多非分要求，政府如果照单全收，将为投资添更多风险。
土著权威组织闹大后，马华副总会长林祥才又建议华人也来一个权威组织。族群权威组织林立，再配上执政的国阵也是以种族为基础，种族两极化潜伏，投资风险再升一级。
新世纪全球化思维
除了土著权威组织，国阵主要成员党巫统领袖的作风，更尽显耍弄权威之能事，搞到党主席首相纳吉忍无可忍要求柔佛州内领袖，不要发表敏感言论吓走新加坡投资。
纳吉说得好，州巫统领袖不应再情绪化，思想更不可狭隘，我们已经处于21世纪，这个国家必须要有21世纪的思维水准。
的确，全民都须跟得上21世纪全球化时代，别只在国内卖弄“权威”，误国殃民。到国际舞台去，那里才知道谁是“权威”，谁有实力！
Monday, July 12, 2010
Friday, July 9, 2010
Kenmark MD Hwang makes news in UK
Kenmark MD Hwang makes news in UK
By YAP LENG KUEN
lengkuen@thestar.com.my
Saturday July 10, 2010
PETALING JAYA: The name of Kenmark Industrial Co (M) Bhd’s “missing’’ managing director James Hwang has surfaced in a UK newspaper, Evening Telegraph, where he was quoted to have said that his company would continue production of televisions.
In an article dated July 6, Hwang had said: “I have never closed down the operations in the UK and I have no intention to close down the operations in the UK.
James Hwang
“The company is not subject to a winding-up order and no creditor has filed such an order. The company will continue production of televisions at Corby (in Northamptonshire, East Midlands, England).’’
The company, based in Longeroft Way at the Eurohub in Corby, was reported to have laid off its temporary workers and closed its TV factory to all but the office staff.
StarBiz called the paper to check on the whereabouts of Hwang but was informed that the information was obtained via the phone, possibly through the factory in Corby.
The reporter who wrote the article could not be reached as she was said to be on a week’s holiday.
Upon advice to call the factory in Corby, this writer contacted the person who was said to be in charge. Declining to be named, he denied that he had put the reporter through to Hwang. But he did not know where Hwang was except that Hwang called him every day to check on things. However, he could not say exactly what time Hwang called every day.
In the Evening Telegraph article, Hwang also said two winding-up orders mentioned in previous reports by the paper referred to a dormant company, Kenmark International (UK) Ltd, and not Kenmark International Ltd.
According to the Taipei Times on Oct 8 last year, the British Trade and Cultural Office in Taipei had said in a statement that their local flat-panel TV maker, Kenmark Industrial Co, had leased a 13,935-sq-m facility to manufacture LCD TVs.
The report from Taipei said Kenmark planned to spend US$30mil on building the new plant and expected to create 500 jobs in Corby over the next three years.
In an earlier article on June 22, the Evening Telegraph said regional business and council leaders were trying to establish what was happening at the factory while no-one at Kenmark’s offices in Corby would talk about the situation.
It said delivery lorries were being turned away by security guards from London and there were only a handful of cars at the plant’s car park.
The report quoted Corby Council chief executive Chris Mallender as saying: “The information I have is that they are still trading, but that the situation with Kenmark in the Far East may have an impact here.
“Things are clearly not right there, but it’s not evident they have closed down. They have laid off their contract staff and appear to be no longer getting deliveries.
“We’re in regular contact with the East Midlands Development Agency’s (EMDA) advisers and we will do all we can to try to keep the company open to protect local jobs.”
The report also quoted a statement from EMDA as saying: “We are aware that Kenmark is restructuring globally. We are in dialogue with Kenmark and UK Trade and Investment (office) in Taipei about what this may mean for the Corby site. Until we are able to clarify this, we are unable to comment further.”
According to a spokesman at the Corby factory, Kenmark produces an average of 30,000 TVs per month for sale in Europe. It had 40 workers but since its financial troubles started, the figure has dropped to 15.
“It is a financial issue and once we solve the problem, we will continue to run,’’ he said, adding that the plant was experiencing shortage of raw materials that mostly came from China and Taiwan.
By YAP LENG KUEN
lengkuen@thestar.com.my
Saturday July 10, 2010
PETALING JAYA: The name of Kenmark Industrial Co (M) Bhd’s “missing’’ managing director James Hwang has surfaced in a UK newspaper, Evening Telegraph, where he was quoted to have said that his company would continue production of televisions.
In an article dated July 6, Hwang had said: “I have never closed down the operations in the UK and I have no intention to close down the operations in the UK.
James Hwang
“The company is not subject to a winding-up order and no creditor has filed such an order. The company will continue production of televisions at Corby (in Northamptonshire, East Midlands, England).’’
The company, based in Longeroft Way at the Eurohub in Corby, was reported to have laid off its temporary workers and closed its TV factory to all but the office staff.
StarBiz called the paper to check on the whereabouts of Hwang but was informed that the information was obtained via the phone, possibly through the factory in Corby.
The reporter who wrote the article could not be reached as she was said to be on a week’s holiday.
Upon advice to call the factory in Corby, this writer contacted the person who was said to be in charge. Declining to be named, he denied that he had put the reporter through to Hwang. But he did not know where Hwang was except that Hwang called him every day to check on things. However, he could not say exactly what time Hwang called every day.
In the Evening Telegraph article, Hwang also said two winding-up orders mentioned in previous reports by the paper referred to a dormant company, Kenmark International (UK) Ltd, and not Kenmark International Ltd.
According to the Taipei Times on Oct 8 last year, the British Trade and Cultural Office in Taipei had said in a statement that their local flat-panel TV maker, Kenmark Industrial Co, had leased a 13,935-sq-m facility to manufacture LCD TVs.
The report from Taipei said Kenmark planned to spend US$30mil on building the new plant and expected to create 500 jobs in Corby over the next three years.
In an earlier article on June 22, the Evening Telegraph said regional business and council leaders were trying to establish what was happening at the factory while no-one at Kenmark’s offices in Corby would talk about the situation.
It said delivery lorries were being turned away by security guards from London and there were only a handful of cars at the plant’s car park.
The report quoted Corby Council chief executive Chris Mallender as saying: “The information I have is that they are still trading, but that the situation with Kenmark in the Far East may have an impact here.
“Things are clearly not right there, but it’s not evident they have closed down. They have laid off their contract staff and appear to be no longer getting deliveries.
“We’re in regular contact with the East Midlands Development Agency’s (EMDA) advisers and we will do all we can to try to keep the company open to protect local jobs.”
The report also quoted a statement from EMDA as saying: “We are aware that Kenmark is restructuring globally. We are in dialogue with Kenmark and UK Trade and Investment (office) in Taipei about what this may mean for the Corby site. Until we are able to clarify this, we are unable to comment further.”
According to a spokesman at the Corby factory, Kenmark produces an average of 30,000 TVs per month for sale in Europe. It had 40 workers but since its financial troubles started, the figure has dropped to 15.
“It is a financial issue and once we solve the problem, we will continue to run,’’ he said, adding that the plant was experiencing shortage of raw materials that mostly came from China and Taiwan.
理财新主张 中国加盟创业网
理财新主张 中国加盟创业网
建立一本合理有效的家庭帐簿，不仅可以帮助你明晰收入和支出，还能帮助你更好地寻找一条开源节流，维持家庭财务良性循环的好方法。
家庭帐簿以简明、易记、易算为好，可以根据个人习惯和对家庭经济开支计划的精细程度来制定不同的表格，进行记帐。以下是两种不同的记帐方式，仅供参考。
1、 每天较笼统地记帐，到月末再按每日所记的帐分类合计。可根据个人习惯粗列或细列收入与支出表，支出项目可写明食物、服装、书报、娱乐、储蓄和其它等。收入项目可以将工资、奖金和工资以外收入。
2、 比较详细规范地记帐，可将预算和决算记在一张总表上，便于对照；每日的开支按项目分类记帐，月末将各项分类统计数字填入总表，一月的家用预算和决算非常明晰。分为收入和支出表，固定开支和非固定开支表。
家庭帐目的记录应该坚持不懈，最好当天帐当天记，做到日清月结。这种方法可以使家用开支一目了然，每个家庭都可以从中摸索出一些规律，以便在下月的预算和实际花费中及时改进，使家庭经济做到有条不紊。
怎样编制家庭预算
编制家庭预算是家庭经济管理的一个重要组成部分，这种“先算后花“的原则可以保证家庭收支基本平衡，防止陷入前吃后空、入不敷出的窘境。
首先要明确预算周期，一般定为月预算和年预算。月预算的目标通常是日常生活开销，比较详细，年预算的目标主要是家庭大件物品的购置和较大的家庭设施的改善等。
一、月预算包括两部分：固定开支和非固定开支。
固定开支是指在一定时期内数目基本不变，无法省略的费用，包括房租、水电、煤气、电话、月票费，以及托儿费或学费、老人赡养费。
非固定开支是指弹性较大，可多可少的支出项目，基本类别包括：食物、服装、日用品、报刊、美容、医药、娱乐、交际、储蓄、临时杂用。
预算时固定开支部分必须留足，非固定开支中的前三项应规定一个基本数额，再根据每月的实际情况予以调整。储蓄一项可以开列一个固定数目，也可在年预算中予以计划。其余各项可视实际情况作合理的规划。
二、年预算要对家庭的一些大目标进行计划，比如购置大件家用家器、更换家具、装修房屋、较远距离的旅行等，并为此进行储蓄筹款，或在月预算中注意压缩某些开支，以保证目标完成。
预算的原则是根据情况，宽紧适度，尤其是非固定开支部分，一定要计划运用得当，打得太宽，容易造成浪费；太紧会难以做到，甚至影响夫妻感情。同时，要考虑大项目，压缩一些可支可不支的项目，以达到花钱的整体效益。
转载请注明文章出处：[www.yktyl.com.cn]
建立一本合理有效的家庭帐簿，不仅可以帮助你明晰收入和支出，还能帮助你更好地寻找一条开源节流，维持家庭财务良性循环的好方法。
家庭帐簿以简明、易记、易算为好，可以根据个人习惯和对家庭经济开支计划的精细程度来制定不同的表格，进行记帐。以下是两种不同的记帐方式，仅供参考。
1、 每天较笼统地记帐，到月末再按每日所记的帐分类合计。可根据个人习惯粗列或细列收入与支出表，支出项目可写明食物、服装、书报、娱乐、储蓄和其它等。收入项目可以将工资、奖金和工资以外收入。
2、 比较详细规范地记帐，可将预算和决算记在一张总表上，便于对照；每日的开支按项目分类记帐，月末将各项分类统计数字填入总表，一月的家用预算和决算非常明晰。分为收入和支出表，固定开支和非固定开支表。
家庭帐目的记录应该坚持不懈，最好当天帐当天记，做到日清月结。这种方法可以使家用开支一目了然，每个家庭都可以从中摸索出一些规律，以便在下月的预算和实际花费中及时改进，使家庭经济做到有条不紊。
怎样编制家庭预算
编制家庭预算是家庭经济管理的一个重要组成部分，这种“先算后花“的原则可以保证家庭收支基本平衡，防止陷入前吃后空、入不敷出的窘境。
首先要明确预算周期，一般定为月预算和年预算。月预算的目标通常是日常生活开销，比较详细，年预算的目标主要是家庭大件物品的购置和较大的家庭设施的改善等。
一、月预算包括两部分：固定开支和非固定开支。
固定开支是指在一定时期内数目基本不变，无法省略的费用，包括房租、水电、煤气、电话、月票费，以及托儿费或学费、老人赡养费。
非固定开支是指弹性较大，可多可少的支出项目，基本类别包括：食物、服装、日用品、报刊、美容、医药、娱乐、交际、储蓄、临时杂用。
预算时固定开支部分必须留足，非固定开支中的前三项应规定一个基本数额，再根据每月的实际情况予以调整。储蓄一项可以开列一个固定数目，也可在年预算中予以计划。其余各项可视实际情况作合理的规划。
二、年预算要对家庭的一些大目标进行计划，比如购置大件家用家器、更换家具、装修房屋、较远距离的旅行等，并为此进行储蓄筹款，或在月预算中注意压缩某些开支，以保证目标完成。
预算的原则是根据情况，宽紧适度，尤其是非固定开支部分，一定要计划运用得当，打得太宽，容易造成浪费；太紧会难以做到，甚至影响夫妻感情。同时，要考虑大项目，压缩一些可支可不支的项目，以达到花钱的整体效益。
转载请注明文章出处：[www.yktyl.com.cn]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)